Nicola Sturgeon: ‘I will not be side tracked by Alex Salmond’s conspiracy theory’
Speaking at the daily coronavirus briefing, Ms Sturgeon told journalists that she did not wants to be “side-tracked” from discussing the pandemic by “the latest instalment of Alex Salmond’s conspiracy theory”.
Mr Davis yesterday used parliamentary privilege to reveal SNP messages he says was given to him by a whistleblower and which he claimed shows a “concerted effort by senior members of the SNP to encourage complaints” against Alex Salmond. He also suggested that Scottish government officials knew earlier than previously acknowledged of the claims.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdIn response to a question about the comments, Ms Sturgeon said: “I refute, I strongly refute the suggestions and insinuations from David Davis in the Commons last night. I’m not going to have this Covid briefing side-tracked by the latest instalment of Alex Salmond’s conspiracy theory. That's just how it is today.
“I have given eight hours of evidence to the parliamentary committee looking into this. They are now able to assess all of the evidence they have taken, including the evidence they have in relation to the evidence and claims made by David Davies last night. They have a job of work to do right now.
"I'm going to allow them to do that job of work and in the meantime get on with my job of work which is leading this Covid briefing.”
Mr Davis accused the Scottish government of ignoring its own procedures and "actively withholding information" from the Holyrood inquiry which has been tasked with looking at the issue. He said he had been passed messages from the telephone of a senior SNP official by a whistleblower.
Speaking at a debate in Westminster, he said: "I have it on good authority that there exists from 6th Feb 2018 an exchange of messages between civil servants suggesting that the first minister's chief of staff is interfering in the complaints process against Alex Salmond.
"If true this suggests the chief of staff had knowledge of the case in February, not April as she has claimed."
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.
If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.
Comments
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.